| 201302209 Hae Sook Yoon
Copyright is property right. If the idea in one's head turns into a creation that we can see, hear, and touch then with the creation one will be able to earn money. Just like trademarks that change the value of any product are protected, copyrighted materials should be protected because those are trademarks of the inventor. For protection of one's property right and better chance of making great creations, copyrighted materials should not be shared or downloaded from Internet. Downloading and sharing copyrighted materials on Internet should be banned because that is clearly violating property right. It is natural notion that one can earn money with what one has made. For example, some people make money by selling their products and some others make money by selling their services. If one's idea can turn into products such as music, trademarks and even thesis, it must be protected as a property right. Violating the property right by violating the copyright will eventually result in bad quality of creations. Many people share and download copyrighted materials through Internet and that cause no profit to the original makers. A rational and reasonable person would not jump into the copyright world expecting to make fortune. This will lead the inventors to abjure their passion. Therefore, the more people violate the copyright, the worse the quality of creation will get and the less opportunity for us to enjoy those creations. It is usually said "imitation is mother of creation" and people say sharing the copyright materials will be a big opportunity to learn. There sure will be more opportunity to learn and expand the aesthetic sense if one is introduced to diverse materials. However, if one is passionate enough s/he will pay to learn others perspective and have broader experiences. That is a fair trade because with that learning, s/he might earn more money one day. To protect one's property right and copyright and to encourage other better creations, sharing and downloading copyrighted materials through Internet must be stopped. Instead of sharing and downloading, we can buy those products through authenticated sites. Fair means will bring happiness to both the inventor and the user.
|
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Hae sook Yoon / Intellectual Property/ Tue. 11am
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From Naeun Kang to Hae Sook Yoon
ReplyDelete1. Yes, it has.
2. Yes, it has: “For protection of one's property right and better chance of making great creations, copyrighted materials should not be shared or downloaded from Internet.”
3. Yes, each body paragraphs have a topic sentence: Downloading and sharing copyrighted materials is violating property right, which will results in bad quality of creations.
4. Yes, it contains a counter-argument. The writer mentions that “imitation is mother of creation” and explains about the meaning. Then, he/she argued against the opinion well.
5. Yes, I think so. The writer gives some example in 2nd paragraph, which let me understand his/her opinion well. Also, I can see a quote in 4th paragraph. These are not boring and support the writer’s argument effectively.
6. Yes. The writer restates the thesis: “To protect one's property right and copyright and to encourage other better creations, sharing and downloading copyrighted materials through Internet must be stopped.” Then, he/she states the issue in a broader context: “Fair means will bring happiness to both the inventor and the user.”
Hi This is Hana Choi from EIT
ReplyDelete1. Yes. The essay has five paragraphs.
2. Yes. The last sentence of the first paragraph shows the writer's thought.
3. Yes. 1st body paragraph says 'Downloading and sharing copyrighted materials on Internet should be banned because that is clearly violating property right.', the topic sentence of 2nd body paragraph is 'Violating the property right by violating the copyright will eventually result in bad quality of creations.' and final body paragraph refutes people who say imitation is a start of creation.
4. Yes. It contains refutation as I mentioned in #3.
5. Yes.
6. Yes. It restate topic sentences in the body paragraphs and also contains the writer's suggestion.
From Seung Hyun Kim to Hae Sook Yoon
ReplyDeleteHello :)
1. Yes, the essay consists of five paragraphs.
2. Yes, in the introduction, the writer states her point of view in the sentence 'For protection of one's property right and better chance of making great creations, copyrighted materials should not be shared or downloaded from Internet.'
3. The first and the second body paragraph do include a topic sentence in which the writer supports her position. They are ' Downloading and sharing copyrighted materials on Internet should be banned because that is clearly violating property right' and 'Violating the property right by violating the copyright will eventually result in bad quality of creations'
4. Yes, the third body paragraph contains a counter-argument. At first the writer admits the opposite point of view to some extent but later in the paragraph, she refutes the point with a different point of view.
5. Yes, the writer presents examples and ideas to support the topic sentences.
6. The writer restates her thesis in different words in the conclusion.
201302209 Hae Sook Yoon
ReplyDeleteCopyright is property right. If the idea in one’s head turns into a creation that we can see, hear, and touch then with the creation one will be able to earn money in the way one usually do through property right. Alike trademarks that change the value of any product are protected; copyrighted materials should be protected because those are trademarks of the inventor. For protection of one’s property right and better chance of making great creations, copyrighted materials should not be shared or downloaded from Internet.
Downloading and sharing copyrighted materials on Internet should be banned because that is clearly violating property right. It is natural notion that one can earn money with what one has made. For example, some people make money by selling their products and some others make money by selling their services. If one’s idea can turn into products such as music, trademarks and even thesis, it must be protected as a property right.
Furthermore, violating the property right by violating the copyright will eventually result in bad quality of creations. Many people share and download copyrighted materials through Internet and that cause no profit to the original makers. A rational and reasonable person would not jump into the copyright world expecting to make fortune. This will lead the inventors to abjure their passion. Therefore, the more people violate the copyright, the worse the quality of creation will get and the less opportunity for us to enjoy those creations.
It is usually said “imitation is mother of creation” and people say sharing the copyright materials will be a big opportunity to learn. There sure will be more opportunity to learn and expand the aesthetic sense if one is introduced to diverse materials. However, there is more information in markets where the copyrighted materials are protected. If one is passionate enough s/he will pay to learn others perspective and have broader experiences. For example, a painter might go to an exhibition to watch how the other painters draw. Thus, paying for the materials under copyrights is a fair trade because with that learning, s/he might earn more money and benefits one day.
To protect one’s property right and copyright and to encourage other better creations, sharing and downloading copyrighted materials through Internet must be stopped. Instead of sharing and downloading, we can buy those products through authenticated sites. Buying copyrighted materials in legal way will enrich our knowledge with more products. With all these reasons, fair means will bring happiness to both the inventor and the user.